IT'S ALL ABOUT UNICORNS

Why does the accused go unpunished when the crime was committed under the influence of drugs, alcohol or a schizophrenic attack?  Generally speaking, both moral philosophy and criminal law accept the idea that a subject who commits a crime under such circumstances, has lost his mind. Expressions like being out of your head, losing your mind, or not knowing who you were, show clear examples of how to deny someone's guilt and consequently responsibility for their actions. In moral philosophy and law it is also assumed that a subject takes responsibility for his actions and therefore for his consequences, as long as he admits to being the author and cause of them. Moreover, the belief that we can choose our lives and decide on our actions makes us moral subjects. In Walden Two Skinner claims that human beings do not have a free will just because they feel one. However, this statement is not harmless but is largely a provocation as it compromises the entire institutional buildin

In his novel Futurum II, Skinner shows an advanced and future society that seems to have found a solution to all social problems. It is a scientific approach to shaping human behavior. These psychologists enjoy a very good reputation among scientific circles because they have found the key to modifying behaviors whose ethical criteria they have previously planned and chosen. With this social and engineering technology, behaviorists plan to increase the happiness of society. They believe that human behavior is a bundle of environmental reactions, either because of their presence or their lack that a person shows in connection with their contextual or environmental variables. Consequently, the concept of free will is an illusion. In fact, for this school, the behavior people show is a consequence of their surrounding and learning stories based on the principle of reinforcement. If the consequences of the actions are bad, then there is a high probability that they will end. However, i

According to Huxley individuals are primarily determined by genetics and genetic manipulation. For Skinner, the behaviour is determined by the manipulation of the environmental variables. But for Huxley, legal drugs are the only way to provide a way out of the conflict. According to Skinner, there is no conflict between the way citizens think and act, as they are convinced that the life they lead is the best, given the possibilities available. A perfect society is achieved by regulating the genetic material and planning jobs according to their genetic abilities. However, according to Skinner, a harmonious society is achieved through the complete regulation of the external factors that cause a particular behavior. With this in mind human actions are highly predictable and therefore controllable. Huxley's utopia is all about the happiness of the citizens. As long as citizens live happily, they will avoid confrontation and war. Nevertheless, Skinner's utopia tries to persuade

Self-control, childhood and lifestyle A child of seven years old sits at the piano seven hours a week. After seven years he plays Mozart's Piano Concerto No. 7. What does this remarkable achievement have to do with self-control?  It is generally understood to be the ability to suppress the primary instincts, desires and inclinations through a technique in order to achieve a certain mental or physical performance. The virtue of playing the piano is the reward for a long wait, which is often painful, since waiting is contrary to the inclination of the child's will. Often self-control involves renouncing short-term pleasures. This is then a delay of the present pleasure, which the child sometimes interprets as a punishment, especially with negative reinforcement. The result of enjoying a later and long-term pleasure is a rational motive, which can be incomprehensible to children and contrary to nature. The will of the child tries to satisfy its own wishes here and now. The

Here is my attempted English back-translation of an excerpt from the 1948 novel "Walden Two" by B. F. Skinner published by Rowohlt in 1985.     The discomfort we systematically create is far milder than the ordinary discomfort we seek to avoid. The discomfort that a well-trained child experiences even during the height of his ethical training is ridiculously trivial. First of all, we don't want to punish children. Neither we don't use something unpleasant to suppress or eradicate undesirable behaviours. Instead, it is prefer to guide the child. Does he behave as we desire, then we provide him something he likes or we remove a situation he doesn't like. As a result we increase the probability that the child behaves as we expect. Now we know how the positive reinforcement works. We can now proceed with clear intent and long-term goals with our scientific approach to modify behaviours. We can exercise a kind of control where the supervised feel free although